|
|
In the future,
virtualization will encompass disk drives as well as
tape and optical devices.
|
|
By Roy Slicker and
Jim Wheeler, Infostor
|
|
According to the
Aberdeen Group consulting firm, in Boston,
virtualization separates the representation of storage
to the server operating system from actual physical
storage. This division of physical storage devices
from the logical storage space presented to users and
applications turns storage into a "utility
pool."
|
|
Virtualization
fulfills a role for storage similar to what an
operating system does for a computer system—namely,
making programming and operation simpler by automating
resource management "housekeeping." When
this process occurs, users are said to be
"viewing resources at a higher level of
abstraction." As such, virtualization is the
abstraction of storage. Virtualization enables end
users to pool a wide range of storage technologies
from different vendors—and, eventually, different
formats—and to easily add capacity and automatically
move data among devices, independent of operating
systems or network infrastructure.
|
|
In an Aberdeen Group
report, senior analyst Dan Tanner says that the
potential benefits of virtualization for IT
administrators include creating virtual volumes that
can span multiple storage units, enabling
heterogeneous "mix and match" of servers and
storage devices, and enabling secure storage sharing
and efficient storage utilization.
|
|
Lately, there have
been more definitions of virtualization than there are
storage start-ups, with an accompanying onslaught of
hype. Storage area network (SAN) vendors claim that
SANs are what virtualization is all about. However,
current SAN solutions do not include software to
handle all storage media types such as secondary
storage. Most virtualization products are limited to
disk subsystems; however, hard disks only address part
of the storage puzzle. Storage virtualization software
should encompass all device/media types to deliver on
the promises of ease of use, scalability, and cost
effectiveness.
|
|
Storage
virtualization should include secondary storage
devices such as tape and optical libraries. Secondary
storage is characterized by the ability to remove the
storage media (cartridges) from the device and store
it away from the primary environment.
|
|
According to a
variety of studies, 80% of online information is
static and unused. In addition, IDC estimates that 55%
of distributed storage management costs are
administrative—a number that could be significantly
reduced through logical consolidation of storage
resources for more-effective management. If static
data is migrated to lower-cost near-line or offline
storage technology, IT managers could re-claim a vast
amount of their current online storage investments.
|
|
Primary Data vs.
Archived Data
IT organizations generally use separate systems to
store frequently accessed data and infrequently
accessed, or archived, data. In many cases there is a
need for software to centralize access to a broad
range of media types. Users want a system that can
search the entire network or enterprise from a single
console and map all the available storage resources
into a single share point or volume.
|
|
All data is not
created equal and should not be treated equally. Disk
subsystems are well-suited as primary storage for a
variety of applications, but there are applications
where secondary storage options are the best solution.
What's needed is an approach to solving the tradeoffs
between capacity, access speed, and cost, while
abstracting the various layers (media types) and
providing a common user interface.
|
|
Users should not have
to choose between media types. In fact, users
generally do not care how the data is stored as long
as it's readily accessible when needed. Virtualization
of storage devices should provide a system that
handles all categories of data (including backup) in a
cost-effective way and with a single user interface.
|
|
Some users will
require a "blending" (virtualization) of the
various storage technologies: "Let me decide what
goes where, based on my data-access requirements and
my legal exposure for storing data." There is
also a concern about the cost of the overall system
and its effectiveness in tracking information and
recovering from failures. A single media solution for
all data can be a disaster if critical information is
lost. The blending of media technologies would provide
users with the highest levels of performance, data
security, and cost-effectiveness.
|
|
Virtualization
techniques under development will enable integration
of the three most common storage categories: hard
disks, tape, and optical.
|
|
One of the major
benefits of virtualization across media types is the
cost reduction associated with the various storage
resources within the shared hardware and media pool.
Data that is used and/or changed frequently belongs on
magnetic disk because access speed is critical.
However, as capacity requirements increase, storage
costs can skyrocket if all data remains on
non-removable media. The vast majority of data on RAID
arrays is not accessed frequently, if at all. This
static data can be offloaded to more cost-effective
storage media, thus freeing up space on the primary
storage system.
|
|
A logical
consolidation of storage technologies results in fewer
IT personnel to manage growing data needs, as well as
a decrease in operating downtime and a reduction of
lost data. Virtualization should abstract hardware
devices as well as individual media types, resulting
in a single view or volume for user interaction.
|
|
All the different
physical storage types on the network can create a
significant storage management dilemma. A single
logical view of storage using virtualization
techniques can streamline data access and management.
Within an organization, storage devices or resources
of different types can be located either in different
locations or be centrally located within a controlled
environment.
|
|
A virtualization
solution should include the option of using any or all
storage levels. Appropriate physical media types would
be automatically selected through the user
application. Based on parameters previously set, the
location of the stored data would be transparent to
users. This kind of media blending, or virtualization,
will facilitate a more efficient storage network and
will provide a scalable solution that is more
cost-efficient to manage.
|
|
Roy Slicker is
the president of Pegasus Disk Technologies (www.pegasus-ofs.com),
and Jim Wheeler is a marketing consultant with the
company, in San Ramon, CA.
|
InfoStor April,
2002
|